Cute Ideas To Do For A Team

Anniversary sentence Sinyavsky and Daniel

I have found on Philology mastodon-signers (Against them, of course - "can not allow," "unworthy of a Soviet writer," etc.).
Maestros. Akhmanova, professor and head of the department of English. Of the Russian nobility. Real scientist. The lady who did disery one left all their approximate - and they had a whole yard. Why she had to sign THIS - I do not know. English Philology Department at the front of our French. We went to his department routinely, the English students were denied entrance. Exit Akhmanova after the faculty meeting was always a solemn triumfalen: first, a teacher ran out and opens the door, then went Two more dispersed and standing at the door of students. After the release itself, led by the hand by two other teacher. Raced ahead of the heralds, to clear expensive process. Behind trailed the whole a rather big part of the department. ... Many years later we moved into a new house. To our neighbor came to her father. We realized that it is a general, although he was in civilian clothes. Because jumping around like grasshoppers, two colonels. About the same - opens the doors, looking ahead, and all is ... I suppose, Madam Akhmanova was not so much a professor of philology, as a general. Cause and signed.

Prof. Tikhonov. Heads of department "Theory literature. " The main question of the Soviet literary theory "has been - this writer socialist realist or critical? Critical realist was Those who saw ulcers of bourgeois society, but saw no way out of the socialist revolution, civil war, collectivization, and other horrors. But the socialist realist he called the writer, who no choice but revolution, civil war, collectivization, not seen. Actually, all literary theory to this and came down (I'm exaggerating, of course). The question of the precise criteria for the determination of social realism and critical realism has not been resolved until the collapse of the Soviet Union. Dean of the Wolves, too "literary theorist, explained to us in a lecture that he was this issue solved, drinking with old then already (90 to 100) mastodon Pospelov, but they ended, so the key question of Soviet theories of literature and has not been resolved. Actually, the same logical - Who have yet to sign a letter against Sinyavsky and Daniel, if not zavkafu, theoretically justified the subordination of the state ideology of literature?

What was I doing in general? Thesis I had a "Treatise of Stendhal's" On Love "and its role in the creative evolution of a Writer ... The word "psychoanalysis" I was forced to remove from the thesis. Freud invented it, and Freud with the 1920 in the USSR is not published, and it could only curse. I graduated in 1985. Gorbachevv that year announced policy of "acceleration", and when the acceleration did not work, two years later declared the "publicity". In 1987 I could not help noticing that Russia has become quite other cities - have changed people's faces, their posture, their eyes filled Arbat Street artists and musicians. And in another year or two again began to publish Freud. And Sinyavsky with Daniel.